CLASS II FOIL - UPPER FIRST BICUSPID -
MESIAL
Class II cavity prepared in
upper first bicuspid, mesio-occlusal surfaces, for
the reception of gold foil as the restorative medium.
Outline Form
A. Occlusal
surface (Fig. 25)
1.
Structural defects and any undermined enamel are removed. Entire central groove
area is included.
2.
Surrounding walls are extended to provide for the manipulation of the gold foil
and the proper finishing of the margins of the restoration.
3.
Distal wall parallels the distal marginal ridge and meets the buccal and lingual walls at a definite sharp angle.
4. Buccal and lingual walls extend to blend harmoniously with
the corresponding walls of the proximal portion of the preparation, and to
provide for access to the interior of the proximal portion of the cavity during
insertion of the gold foil. This usually requires a reverse curve in the buccal wall where the occlusal
portion meets the proximal wall.
5. The average bucco-lingual width of the isthmus of this preparation is
no greater than 3/4 to 1 mm in natural tooth. (The isthmus is the narrowest bucco-lingual dimension of the step portion.)
B. Proximal surface (Fig. 26)
1. Gingival Wall
a.
Placed so gingival margin is uniformly about halfway into the depth of the free
gingival crevice.
b.
Straight bucco-lingually.
c. Meets
the buccal and lingual walls at a definite angle. The
bucco-gingival angle is usually approximately a right
angle or obtuse angle. The linguo-gingival angle is
acute.
Note: In the development of the outline form it is essential that the
gingival wall be established first. The position occupied by the gingival wall
determines the outline form of the entire preparation. This maxim holds true
for all proximal cavity preparations.
2. Buccal
and Lingual Walls
a.
Include defective or carious area.
b.
Extended to areas of the tooth surface which are less susceptible to recurrence
of decay.
c. Placed
in areas which are capable of being finished readily.
d.
In view of the demands of esthetics and inconspicuousness, in the natural tooth
the buccal margin clears the approximating tooth by
1/2 - 3/4 mm. Viewing it at an angle perpendicular to the tangent it is
straight from occlusal to gingival; sighting it from
over the mesial approximating tooth it is, in
general, parallel to the contour of that tooth.
e.
The lingual margin uniformly clears the approximating tooth by 1 mm.
Resistance and Retention Form
A. Occlusal
(step) portion
1. Pulpal Wall
a. Flat.
b. At
right angles to the long axis of the tooth (Fig. 28).
c. Established just within the dentin (Fig. 27).
2. Buccal and Lingual Walls
a. Smooth and straight.
b. Meet the pulpal wall at a
right angle except at the isthmus where the angle is slightly obtuse (Fig. 28).
3. Buccal wall follows into disto-buccal
developmental groove slightly, to form a dovetail (Fig. 25).
4.
Distal Wall
a.
Straight.
b. Parallels the distal marginal ridge (Fig. 25).
c. Meets the buccal and
lingual walls at sharp angles.
d. Forms an obtuse angle with the pulpal
(Fig. 27).
5.
The reverse curve in the buccal outline follows
through the whole wall as the occlusal portion meets
the proximal portion. This opens the "throat" of the cavity and
allows better access with the condensing instruments (Fig. 28).
B. Proximal portion (Fig. 28)
1.
Gingival Wall
a. Flat, straight.
b. Basically at right angles to the long axis of the
tooth bucco-lingually, dependent on requirement that
this margin must be under the normal free gingival tissue.
c. Slopes in to the axial to meet that wall at a
slightly acute angle (Fig. 27).
d. Axio-gingival line angle
is established just within the dentin but is slightly deeper axially than in a
preparation for a gold inlay.
e. Meets the buccal and
lingual walls in clean sharp definite angles.
2. Buccal and Lingual Walls
a. Meet the axial wall at a right angle or very
slightly obtuse angle (Fig. 28).
b. Are on a plane parallel with that of the enamel
rods.
3.
Axial Wall (Fig. 27)
a.
Parallel with long axis of tooth (not with surface contour as in the Class V
Foil preparation).
b. Flat bucco-lingually.
c. Established within dentin.
d. Meets pulpal wall at
definite sharp angle.
4. Bucco-axio-gingival and linguo-axio-gingival
point angles are definite, sharp and slightly acute (Figs. 27 & 29).
5.
Bucco-axial line angle and linguo-axial
line angle fade into buccal and lingual walls
respectively of the occlusal portion of the cavity
(Fig. 28).
C. Retention, then, is
provided by
1.
Convergence occlusally of buccal
and lingual proximal walls.
2. Occlusal dovetail.
3.
Slightly acute axio-gingival line angle.
4.
Compressibility of dentin.
Convenience Form
Is
necessary to enable adequate line of force for compaction of the gold foil. The only special provision is the establishment of
the reverse curve in the buccal wall. Otherwise the
requirements are met by having clean sharp line angles, point angles and proper
outline form.
Finish of the Enamel Walls
1. The enamel walls are
planed smooth.
2. Walls must have full
length enamel rods, supported by sound dentin.
3. A very light bevel is
usually required on the occlusal cavosurface
margin, and is sometimes needed on the gingival cavosurface
margin to avoid short unsupported enamel rods (Figs. 27, 29).
4. The cavosurface
angle presents a continuous, smooth line devoid of irregularities.
CLASS II FOIL - LOWER FIRST BICUSPID -
MESIAL
Ferrier Design
Class II cavity prepared in
the mesial surface of lower first bicuspid, for the
reception of gold foil as the restorative medium.
This cavity, a variation of
the typical Class II preparation, was developed by W.I. Ferrier. It is prepared
as a proximal box form only, with no occlusal step,
and is used only in this location, since the mesial
marginal ridge of the mandibular first bicuspid
normally is not subject to functional stress, yet minimal display of metal is
highly desirable, It is simple in form, but requires
precise, delicate execution.
Fig. 61 Class II Foil -
Non-step Preparation Lower First Bicuspid
Outline Form
A. Proximal Surface (Fig. 61)
1.
Very restricted preparation. Mechanical separation is utilized to reduce buccal and lingual extensions.
2.
Gingival
a. Placed uniformly within gingival sulcus.
b. Straight bucco-lingually.
c. Meets buccal and lingual
outline at a definite sharp angle.
3. Buccal and Lingual
a. Include defective or carious area.
b. Clear labial and lingual distal line angles of cuspid crown uniformly, by approximately 1/2 mm on the buccal and 3/4-1 mm on the lingual.
c. Esthetics is the guiding factor for the buccal extension, while prevention of recurrence predominates
for the lingual extension. The lingual is therefore usually somewhat greater.
d. As in any proximal outline where esthetics is
important, it is straight from occlusal to gingival
when viewed at an angle perpendicular to the tangent; sighting from over the cuspid it is, in general, parallel to the contour of that
tooth.
B. Occlusal
(Fig. 62)
1.
Is formed by the occlusal extension of the proximal
box. It is a simple rectangle in form.
2.
The distal outline is flush with the depth of the axial wall. Occasionally some
slight variation in form may be necessary if the mesial
triangular groove or mesial pit closely approximates
the mesial outline.
3.
The lingual outline sometimes has to be extended somewhat, if the proximal
lingual wall opens to the occlusal very close to the mesial spillway.
4.
The distal wall meets the buccal and lingual walls at
a definite angle.
Resistance and Retention Form
A. Resistance Form (Fig. 63)
1.
The only resistance form required in this preparation is that which is needed
to withstand the forces applied for the compaction of the restorative
material, for the mesial marginal ridge of this tooth
usually is not in functional occlusion.
2.
Gingival Wall
a. Flat.
b. Perpendicular to plane of occlusal
stress.
c. Deep enough so axio-gingival
angle is within the dentin. It is somewhat deeper than
would be required for a cast restoration, so there will be adequate bulk of
foil.
3. Buccal and Lingual Walls
a. Each is in a single plane from cavosurface
to axial wall.
b. Meet the axial at an acute angle.
c. Meet the gingival wall at a definite, sharply
defined angle.
d. Generally straight throughout the occluso-gingival length.
4.
Axial Wall
a. Deep enough to be in dentin.
b. Flat occluso-gingivally
and bucco-lingually.
c. Generally parallels long axis rather than mesial contour of tooth.
d. Meets gingival, buccal
and lingual walls in a definite acute angle.
B. Retention is provided
through
1.
Convergence gingivo-occlusally of the buccal and lingual walls.
2.
Slightly undercut buccal and lingual walls.
3.
Sloping of gingival wall in a gingival direction from cavosurface
to the axial wall to form a slightly acute, axio-gingival
angle.
4.
Sharp, definite line angles and bucco- and linguo-axio-gingival point angles.
5.
Compressibility of the dentin and utilizing the wedging principle of gold foil
flowing under compacting force.
Convenience Form
1. Is
necessary to enable access during preparation of cavity and for compaction of
foil.
2. Due to restricted occlusal access, a mechanical separator is placed for the
preparation as well as for the insertion of the foil.
3. Sharp line angles and
point angles and undercut retention form facilitate the placement and retention
of the foil.
Finish of the Enamel Walls
1. The enamel walls are
planed true and smooth.
2. Walls must have full
length enamel rods, supported by sound dentin.
3. A very slight cavosurface bevel is formed on the occlusal
cavosurface angles, especially at the occluso-proximal angle of lingual margin where short enamel
rods are likely to occur because of the proximity to the mesial
spillway (Fig. 63).
4. Occasionally the gingival cavosurface angle will require a short bevel to avoid
short, unsupported enamel rods.
5. The cavosurface
angle presents a continuous smooth line devoid of irregularities.
The above lists,
instructional materials & recommended readings have been prepared by Dr
Gerald D Stibbs and the members of the George Ellsperman Gold Foil Seminar. They have been used be the George Ellsperman Gold Foil Seminar for our instructional manual
and course materials over the years.
Some modifications have been made from the original list by the members
of the GEGFS, but they are largely the work of Dr Gerald D Stibbs.
The Digital
edition has been the work of the George Ellsperman
Gold Foil Seminar under the direction of Dr. Bruce B Smith.